This is terrible news in my opinion. Hannibal at
Ars Technica reports that the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office has upheld Eola's patent on embedded web applications. While the nominal target is Microsoft's
ActiveX, the implications of this ruling can potentially be much wider. Hannibal concludes:
"I'm not going to do any doom-and-gloom speculation on what this victory means, especially when the infringement case
is being appealed to the Supreme Court; I'll let you guys handle the speculation in the discussion thread. I'll just
wrap up by noting that the '906 patent appears to be vague enough to cover almost any program that's embedded in a Web
page and that talks bidirectionally with a server. That means not just Microsoft's ActiveX, the technology that
originally brought on the round of Eolas vs. Microsoft infringement lawsuits, but Flash, Java, and most of the other
stuff that makes the Web interesting to use. So there's no doubt that if the Eolas folks can take this fight all the
way, they'll be very, very rich. It remains to be seen, however, just how much headache they'll cause for the rest of
us as Microsoft and everyone else rushes to work around the patent."
A dark day. When this goes to the Supreme Court they'll hopefully see the implications and temper or nullify this
decision.
eWEEK provides more background on today's events
here.








1. This is actually the one worst news in the history of the internet. This little company Eolas, with no product, 1 employee, 3 lawyers and 100 investors, stands to control a critical part of the Web's infrastructure, which was free until now.
Just one example: millions of Myspace and Xanga users have videos embedded into their pages- guess what- it will not work if Microsoft looses, since the proposed workaround to embed applets involves Javascript, which Myspace and Xanga block.
This is the picture of the "inventor":
http://www.iomas.com/ec/htdocs/images/picmike.gif
Posted at 5:16AM on Dec 19th 2005 by sutrostyle