<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Unofficial Microsoft Weblog</title>
<link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com</link>
<description>The Unofficial Microsoft Weblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>iPods foster stealing music, apparently.</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/06/07/ipods-foster-stealing-music-apparently/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/06/07/ipods-foster-stealing-music-apparently/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/06/07/ipods-foster-stealing-music-apparently/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/trends-and-buzz/" rel="tag">Trends and Buzz</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/legal-issues/" rel="tag">Legal Issues</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/06/ipodpirate.jpg" />My first thought about Real Networks CEO Rob Glaser saying the half the music on iPod is stolen, is "you're just jealous." Honestly, as the link below suggests, many people HAVE downloaded "stolen" music, but many of them have a lot of their own music they have ripped for iPod play. Steve Ballmer allegedly echoed Glaser's sentiments by stating that "The most common format of music on an iPod is 'stolen'." May I remind both Rob and Steve that *IF* they had a decent iPod killer, there would also be "stolen" music on their players. It has nothing to do with the iPod. The problem really lies in the shift of a MAJOR music paradigm. It is mostly a matter of format. People generally rip their own albums because they want the ultra-mobility, style, and easy listening that the iPod offers. The fact that Apple has sold so many songs means that something is working. Just because the average is 25 songs to an iPod purchased legally, doesn't mean that many people still don't have an iPod, and simply buy songs for listening on their PC or Mac. This is another case of a CEO spouting off without doing his research or having the gusto to back up what he says, perhaps in the form of a REAL music store or a REAL mp3 playing device. Until then, I don't want to hear about it. Stolen music is a bigger problem than just iPod users. I thought everyone knew that by now.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/05/11/half_ipod_music_stolen_real_says/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/06/07/ipods-foster-stealing-music-apparently/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/624831/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/06/07/ipods-foster-stealing-music-apparently/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>apple</category><category>ipod</category><category>microsoft</category><category>music</category><category>pirate</category><category>real</category><category>Rob glaser</category><category>RobGlaser</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>stolen</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-06-07T01:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Microsoft releases Mac-specific keyboard and mouse</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-releases-mac-specific-keyboard-and-mouse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-releases-mac-specific-keyboard-and-mouse/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-releases-mac-specific-keyboard-and-mouse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/trends-and-buzz/" rel="tag">Trends and Buzz</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.downloadsquad.com/media/2006/05/microsoftmachardware.jpg" />It's not all that common that we're able to link to our sister site, <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-releases-mac-specific-wireless-laser-desktop/">TUAW, in reference to Microsoft news</a>. But today we can do just that. Microsoft has released a keyboard and mouse combination specifically for Macs, right down to the brushed silver / grey color, and lack of a Windows key. While I think most people can agree that Microsoft's current generation of PC hardware - specifically user input devices - is top-notch, it's still a little bit perplexing that Microsoft would go so far as to actually release Mac only hardware. Their keyboards and mice have long been compatible with Macs, and currently have markings for both Windows and OS X on new keyboards. To be clear, I'm not against the Mac-specific hardware, just a little confused as to the need for it. But, there you go.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tuaw.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-releases-mac-specific-wireless-laser-desktop/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-releases-mac-specific-keyboard-and-mouse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/623310/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-releases-mac-specific-keyboard-and-mouse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>mac keyboard</category><category>mac mouse</category><category>MacKeyboard</category><category>MacMouse</category><category>microsoft mac hardware</category><category>MicrosoftMacHardware</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-05-30T18:03:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Sony launching 'PlayStation' branded luxury goods</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/30/sony-launching-playstation-branded-luxury-goods/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/30/sony-launching-playstation-branded-luxury-goods/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/30/sony-launching-playstation-branded-luxury-goods/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/xbox-360/" rel="tag">XBOX 360</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/05/playstationwineglass.jpg" alt="" />The always entertaining Mike Elgan points to a Japanese site that purportedly has news of <a href="http://www.therawfeed.com/2006/05/sony-launches-playstation-brand-luxury.html">Sony launching a new 'PlayStation' brand of luxury goods</a>, such as wine glasses, corkscrews, photo frames and even sweaters. While we haven't been able to confirm this, it's a rumor that's not all that difficult to believe given some of the crazy messages that have been coming out of Sony about the premium price point of the upcoming PlayStation 3 console.&nbsp;<br /><br />But PlayStation as a luxury brand? To be honest, even Xbox is a better brand name for that type of product line. Xbox implies something mysterious, something new. PlayStation implies a toy my one-year-old would play with.&nbsp;<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.therawfeed.com/2006/05/sony-launches-playstation-brand-luxury.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/30/sony-launching-playstation-branded-luxury-goods/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/623204/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/30/sony-launching-playstation-branded-luxury-goods/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>PlayStation goods</category><category>PlaystationGoods</category><category>Sony PlayStation</category><category>SonyPlaystation</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-05-30T14:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>iMicrosoft?</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/23/imicrosoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/23/imicrosoft/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/23/imicrosoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/trends-and-buzz/" rel="tag">Trends and Buzz</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/05/pix003.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Is Microsoft chasing Apple? A lot of Microsoft's latest releases&nbsp;suggest they are. But this is news to no one, everyone knows that Apple tops the charts by a long shot, and that Microsoft wants a piece of the pie. With URGE, Microsoft (and MTV) have a store like iTunes; with their product for music production codenamed Monaco, Microsoft is going after GarageBand; and with Vista, Microsoft is chasing a lot of the&nbsp;shiny features of OS X, especially widgets. In the end, I wonder IF Microsoft can catch with Apple. I think it's possible, but they definitely have a long uphill climb ahead of them. One thing I like about Microsoft's PlaysForSure mp3 player&nbsp;strategy is that many different devices work with the same store, not just one, like the iPod and iTunes. I have heard a bunch of dialog in the blogosphere that Microsoft would do well to include iPod support. I agree, since everyone already has an iPod. In fact, to me it is non-negotiable.&nbsp;If you freeze out the competition because of a stupid brand grudge, you are cheating yourself out of potential customers who don't really care where they get their music, so long as it works with their player. I would have to raise my hand on that one. I personally am not a huge fan of iTunes. I don't like the interface and some of the quirks. Microsoft's motto seems to be, "not quite."&nbsp;Fuse the PlaysForSure initiative, iPod support, and a much better performing version of WMP 11, and you have something there. Until then, don't bother.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://urge.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/23/imicrosoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/621268/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/23/imicrosoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>apple</category><category>microsoft</category><category>music</category><category>URGE</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-05-23T23:18:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Microsoft Subpoenaed once again</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/15/microsoft-subpoenaed-once-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/15/microsoft-subpoenaed-once-again/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/15/microsoft-subpoenaed-once-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/trends-and-buzz/" rel="tag">Trends and Buzz</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/windows-general/" rel="tag">Windows - General</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/amdintel.jpg" />AMD is getting all <ahref="http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2006/4/15/3603">subpoena happy lately</a>, and trying to prove thatIntel has a monopoly. Microsoft is among those subpoenaed to appear in court. Others such as Best Buy, Circuit City andthe like are also being subpoenaed (try to spell that five times fast) as well. What game is AMD playing? Is this the"fighting&nbsp;dirty" that they had to resort to because good old fashioned American competition wasn't doingit for them?&nbsp;Microsoft is apparently not very bothered by this, and they shouldn't be, Windows runs on botharchitectures, Intel and AMD. Oh, this just in, Windows apparently runs on Apple hardware now too, but I bet you knewthat. Perhaps Intel's foray into the orchard has AMD all up in arms. So, here's a clue, create an AMD Mac. It's athought.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2006/4/15/3603>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/15/microsoft-subpoenaed-once-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/608978/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/15/microsoft-subpoenaed-once-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>AMD</category><category>apple</category><category>Intel</category><category>microsoft</category><category>processor</category><category>subpoena</category><category>TUAW</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-15T23:15:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Codename: Monaco</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/07/codename-monaco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/07/codename-monaco/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/07/codename-monaco/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/xp/" rel="tag">XP</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/trends-and-buzz/" rel="tag">Trends and Buzz</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/windows-general/" rel="tag">Windows - General</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/90685.jpg" alt=""/>Microsoft is plotting and planning a new program to rival Apple's GarageBand music creations software, according toMary Jo Foley of <ahref="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1947464,00.asp?kc=MWRSS02129TX1K0000535">Microsoft Watch</a>. Itis all very hush hush right now, as you might imagine, but I am glad Microsoft is thinking about how to be a player incertain markets which I consider to be important to the average Joe.<br /><br />With shows like American Idol and thelike, so many people are now getting into music or have been inspired to create music as of late. Personally, I don'tsee a lot of viable, consumer-friendly music creation software out there to help all these budding artists become whothey want to be. To keep in the vein of the "magic of software" I think Microsoft needs to create moreapplications like this one.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1947464,00.asp?kc=MWRSS02129TX1K0000535>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/07/codename-monaco/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/606655/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/07/codename-monaco/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>apple</category><category>garage band</category><category>GarageBand</category><category>microsoft</category><category>monaco</category><category>windows</category><category>xp</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-07T15:52:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>VMware offers free bootcamp alternative</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/07/vmware-offers-free-bootcamp-alternative/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/07/vmware-offers-free-bootcamp-alternative/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/07/vmware-offers-free-bootcamp-alternative/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/xp/" rel="tag">XP</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/windows-general/" rel="tag">Windows - General</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/pixoh_1bj4hx80il.jpg" />It was announced a while ago that VMwareserver was free as a downloadable beta. Being the busy guy that I am, I haven't had a chance to play with it until lastnight. I have to tell you that I was pleasantly surprised that it worked so well and easily as it did. You can createvirtual machines with it, which is something you couldn't do with the VMware player. Installing a virtual copy ofwindows XP pro was extremely easy as well. I haven't tried it yet, but I hope to soon create a virtual machine usingMac OS X to see if it works. why it wouldn't I don't know so long as it is the x86 version built for the Intel mac.This offers a viable option for those who really don't want to reboot every time they want to get into their computer'salter-ego.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://vmware.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/07/vmware-offers-free-bootcamp-alternative/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/606586/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/07/vmware-offers-free-bootcamp-alternative/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>intel</category><category>mac</category><category>microsoft</category><category>OS X</category><category>OsX</category><category>windows</category><category>xp</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-07T15:03:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Forrester: the Microsoft brand is not trusted</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/04/forrester-the-microsoft-brand-is-not-trusted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/04/forrester-the-microsoft-brand-is-not-trusted/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/04/forrester-the-microsoft-brand-is-not-trusted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/financial/" rel="tag">Financial</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/billgatessad.jpg" align="right" vspace="4"border="1" alt="" />DesignTechnica has a brief article summing up a study done by <ahref="http://www.forrester.com/">Forrester Research</a> last year called the <ahref="http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,38694,00.html">2005 Technology Brand Scorecard</a>. Theresearch company surveyed 4,732 households to determine which brands are well trusted and have "brandpotential", indicating an ability to increase their business. Unfortunately, Microsoft scored 20th out of 22technology companies for trust, and was the only company to receive a negative brand potential score. The negativebrand potential score appears to indicate that while many people use Microsoft products, a high percentage wouldhappily leave them behind if a viable alternative was presented. Get the full rundown from <ahref="http://news.designtechnica.com/article9959.html">DesignTechnica</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,38694,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/04/forrester-the-microsoft-brand-is-not-trusted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/605430/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/04/forrester-the-microsoft-brand-is-not-trusted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Forrester Research</category><category>ForresterResearch</category><category>Microsoft brand trouble</category><category>Microsoft branding</category><category>MicrosoftBranding</category><category>MicrosoftBrandTrouble</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-04T07:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Google's new market</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/01/googles-new-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/01/googles-new-market/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/01/googles-new-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/trends-and-buzz/" rel="tag">Trends and Buzz</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/romance.jpg" align="right" vspace="4"border="0" />Today Google dives into a brand new market, romance. Why Microsoft hasn't even thought of this in a realway, I don't know. Sure they have MSN personals, but who even pays attention to those. The thing that I admire aboutGoogle's new Romance service is that Google realizes that geeks need love too. Google even allows geeks to uploadmultiple profiles all in one shot to save time. This is the first such service I have seen on the web that truly catersto search-savvy folks looking for love. I know it sounds a little weird, but honestly it makes sense. Google wants apiece of the online dating action. Their contextual dating service offers a great way to go on dates and get relevanttext ads at the same time. In a way it's almost comforting, seeing the same ads I see in Gmail, and have next to mypersonal blog while dating. I am married, but my wife and I are thinking of trying out contextual dating, just toexperience this brilliant technology. Click <a href="http://www.google.com/romance/">here to visit Google Romance</a>,then click here to <a href="http://www.google.com/romance/start.html">submit a report</a> about your Google Romanceexperience, and let Google know how it went. You may not really get the full effect of this service until you <ahref="http://www.google.com/romance/start.html">submit a report</a>, only then it makes total sense. Also, do you knowwhat today is?<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.google.com/romance/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/01/googles-new-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/604776/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/01/googles-new-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>dating</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>romance</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-01T12:36:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Ballmer's kids brainwashed against Google, iPods</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/31/ballmers-kids-brainwashed-against-google-ipods/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/31/ballmers-kids-brainwashed-against-google-ipods/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/31/ballmers-kids-brainwashed-against-google-ipods/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/trends-and-buzz/" rel="tag">Trends and Buzz</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/03/ballmer.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1"alt="" />Wow, I mean just, wow. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer was interviewed by Telis Demos for <ahref="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/04/03/8373041/index.htm">an article publishedyesterday on CNN Money</a>. In it, Ballmer volunteers that he has "brainwashed" his children to not useGoogle or iPods. The crazy thing here is that the word was his own! <br /><br />I have to say that I simply feel sorryfor his children. I just don't believe that they actually avoid using Google - who in their right mind does? Google'sthe only search engine that is so consistently good enough that it's name has actually become a verb for searching onthe web. Nobody ever MSN'd anything. So basically, Ballmer has kids that have to sneak around using Google when he'snot around, and lie about it to his face. Hell, I bet they even have iPods, and have switched the headphones to blackones so that he doesn't notice, like the <a href="http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,66460,00.html">80% of Microsoftemployees with digital audio players do as well</a>.<br /><br />This is the article where Ballmer <ahref="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/31/microsoft-ipod-killer-give-up-already/">drops hints about Microsoft'spotential response to the iPod</a>.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/04/03/8373041/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/31/ballmers-kids-brainwashed-against-google-ipods/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/604441/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/31/ballmers-kids-brainwashed-against-google-ipods/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>ballmer brainwash</category><category>BallmerBrainwash</category><category>Microsoft CEO</category><category>MicrosoftCeo</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-31T09:41:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Apple joins BAPCo, Windows benchmarking consortium</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/30/apple-joins-bapco-windows-benchmarking-consortium/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/30/apple-joins-bapco-windows-benchmarking-consortium/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/30/apple-joins-bapco-windows-benchmarking-consortium/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right"src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/03/microsoftapple.jpg" alt="" />Jordan over at DownloadSquad is&nbsp;<ahref="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2006/03/29/apple-joins-windows-benchmarking-group/">killing  us</a> with hisMicrosoft scoops this week; the latest is that <ahref="http://gearlog.com/blogs/gearlog/archive/2006/03/28/8751.aspx">Apple  Computer has joined an organization calledBAPCo</a>, which is a consortium with  the purpose of benchmarking Windows configurations. Interestingly, this most likely indicates that Apple is interested in knowing how their hardware stacks  up against other PC maker's hardware inthe industry.
<p>It's not certain that Apple wants to get into the Windows PC hardware  business, but it's alsodefinitely not certain that they don't. When you make  arguably the best computing hardware available on the market andthere's a  chance to make your hardware compatible with the operating system that 95% of  the computing market uses, itwould be very hard not to consider moving in that  direction. Even if Apple does not officially move in that direction,all the  excitement over getting Windows XP to boot on an iMac proves that even if it is  not sanctioned, it willhappen. </p>
<p>Maybe Apple simply wants to be involved in the fun.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gearlog.com/blogs/gearlog/archive/2006/03/28/8751.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/30/apple-joins-bapco-windows-benchmarking-consortium/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/604073/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/30/apple-joins-bapco-windows-benchmarking-consortium/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>apple benchmarking</category><category>Apple Microsoft</category><category>AppleBenchmarking</category><category>AppleMicrosoft</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-30T06:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Not exactly the British are coming</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/16/not-exactly-the-british-are-coming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/16/not-exactly-the-british-are-coming/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/16/not-exactly-the-british-are-coming/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/xp/" rel="tag">XP</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/vista/" rel="tag">Vista</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/trends-and-buzz/" rel="tag">Trends and Buzz</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/windows-general/" rel="tag">Windows - General</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/03/pixoh_t3fubnr6c%282%29.jpg" />Look out Apple, the Windows people arecoming. Those Microsoft groupies who would enslave the free world, the scum on your proverbial shoes is coming. Call ita Trojan horse, call it whatever you want, but the sexiness that is the Mac will now be available to us XP users. Thecontest is over, <a href="http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000430073590/">hack-a-day reports </a>on this landmarkachievement and you can find the files and instructions to actually perform this feat <ahref="http://windows.onmac.net/">here</a>. I know that Apple people don't care if Windows users like the mac or not,unless it affects the bottom line (who wouldn't), but for Windows users, we finally get the best of both worlds, slickapple hardware, and a more widely accepted windows platform, and the venerable Mac OS X as well. What more could youask for? <br /><br />The announcements that Vista (and now XP) will run on an Intel mac have me almost thinking aboutbuying one for the very first time. I have thought about buying a mac before, but more in a PC mag centerfold, oooohthat's hot, never with any serious thought behind it. Mac doesn't live in my world, until now. One question though forthose of you who use both mac and Windows regularly, what do you do about the right mouse button for windows on anIntel mac, especially on a laptop? I'm busting out my red coat this afternoon and hitching my get-along to Bessie, mytrusted steed. Giddyap ya old milksap!<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/16/windows-xp-on-mac-solution-posted/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/16/not-exactly-the-british-are-coming/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/600065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/16/not-exactly-the-british-are-coming/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>apple</category><category>mac</category><category>windows</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-16T15:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Google Does Stuff Writely</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/09/google-does-stuff-writely/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/09/google-does-stuff-writely/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/09/google-does-stuff-writely/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/trends-and-buzz/" rel="tag">Trends and Buzz</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/03/writely.jpg" />Google is acquiring Writely. The Unofficial GoogleBlog covers it nicely <a href="http://google.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/09/google-writely/">here</a>. For anyone whodoesn't know, Writely is an excellently written Web 2.0 application that functions as an online word processor. I thinkin some ways the simplicity of it makes it easier to use than Microsoft Word, especially for less savvyusers.</p>
<p>What I find interesting about this is Google's total focus on web-based offerings, and Microsoft's totaldesktop approach. While this doesn't surprise me in the least, I am not sure that both approaches have nodisadvantages. My feeling is that eventually&nbsp;through acquisitions like this one Google is building an online suiteof apps to completely dethrone Microsoft's Office and other programs. You may have heard that Google is already workingon a&nbsp;calendar app.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dvhardware.net/article10289.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/09/google-does-stuff-writely/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/598213/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/09/google-does-stuff-writely/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>writely</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-09T20:16:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Some Climb on Rocks</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/07/some-climb-on-rocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/07/some-climb-on-rocks/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/07/some-climb-on-rocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/office-general/" rel="tag">Office - General</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/03/openoffice.jpg" />Microsoft is just a big kid trying to make alittle kid cry (not that it will work). I really don't see what value it has in yelling about <ahref="http://openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a> being <a href="http://www.legitreviews.com/news/1894/">10 yearsout-of-date</a>. <br /><br />What is with Microsoft trying to kill Linux and open-source so vehemently? Have they notlooked at their market share lately? I vote for focusing on outpacing the competition with real results (somethingrevolutionary) instead of trash talking. I don't think they have that much to worry about, at least not yet. I guess itfollows the old saying that goes something like: "If you can't beat them join them, and if you don't want to jointhem then at least trash talk them, but if you do end up beating them, why not trash talk them anyway, what does ithurt, right?" Well, I suppose that isn't so old because I just made it up, but I think that pretty much says itall right there.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.legitreviews.com/news/1894/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/07/some-climb-on-rocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/597188/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/07/some-climb-on-rocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>microsoft</category><category>open office .org</category><category>OpenOffice.org</category><category>trash talking</category><category>TrashTalking</category><dc:creator>Ryan Carter</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-07T01:04:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Comparing Presentation Styles of Gates and Jobs</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/06/presentation-zen-gates-jobs-and-the-zen-aesthetic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/06/presentation-zen-gates-jobs-and-the-zen-aesthetic/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/06/presentation-zen-gates-jobs-and-the-zen-aesthetic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/powerpoint/" rel="tag">PowerPoint</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/03/complicated_bill.jpg" />Picking up on the theme of the differencebetween Microsoft's design ethic and Apple's, here's <ahref="http://presentationzen.blogs.com/presentationzen/2005/11/the_zen_estheti.html">an analysis of the difference inthe presentation styles of Bill Gates and Steve Jobs</a>. It's very interesting in that it outlines for me what I'mreally starting to reject, which is information overload. <br /><br />As with its software, Apple's presentations tendtowards simplicity; single words or phrases. Microsoft's is a barrage of bullet points and concepts, ostensiblyintended to appear impressive. Unfortunately, more often than not I find I simply turn off with that much informationcoming at me. <br /><br />All is not lost, however. As Jensen Harris has been reporting <ahref="http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/default.aspx">on his blog</a> regularly, a huge amount of thought is going into theuser interface of Office 2007, with one of the main goals to be reducing the amount of options and buttons the user hasto look at. For one, I can't wait. Information overload is happening in our inboxes and RSS readers, but it's alsohappening on our screens and in our presentations. Let's reign it in!<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://presentationzen.blogs.com/presentationzen/2005/11/the_zen_estheti.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/06/presentation-zen-gates-jobs-and-the-zen-aesthetic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/597079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/06/presentation-zen-gates-jobs-and-the-zen-aesthetic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>presentation styles</category><category>PresentationStyles</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-06T18:04:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>