<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Unofficial Microsoft Weblog</title>
<link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com</link>
<description>The Unofficial Microsoft Weblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Forrester: the Microsoft brand is not trusted</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/04/forrester-the-microsoft-brand-is-not-trusted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/04/forrester-the-microsoft-brand-is-not-trusted/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/04/forrester-the-microsoft-brand-is-not-trusted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/competition/" rel="tag">Competition</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/financial/" rel="tag">Financial</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/04/billgatessad.jpg" align="right" vspace="4"border="1" alt="" />DesignTechnica has a brief article summing up a study done by <ahref="http://www.forrester.com/">Forrester Research</a> last year called the <ahref="http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,38694,00.html">2005 Technology Brand Scorecard</a>. Theresearch company surveyed 4,732 households to determine which brands are well trusted and have "brandpotential", indicating an ability to increase their business. Unfortunately, Microsoft scored 20th out of 22technology companies for trust, and was the only company to receive a negative brand potential score. The negativebrand potential score appears to indicate that while many people use Microsoft products, a high percentage wouldhappily leave them behind if a viable alternative was presented. Get the full rundown from <ahref="http://news.designtechnica.com/article9959.html">DesignTechnica</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,38694,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/04/forrester-the-microsoft-brand-is-not-trusted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/605430/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/04/forrester-the-microsoft-brand-is-not-trusted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Forrester Research</category><category>ForresterResearch</category><category>Microsoft brand trouble</category><category>Microsoft branding</category><category>MicrosoftBranding</category><category>MicrosoftBrandTrouble</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-04T07:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Class action suit in N.Y.</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/28/class-action-suit-in-n-y/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/28/class-action-suit-in-n-y/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/28/class-action-suit-in-n-y/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/legal-issues/" rel="tag">Legal Issues</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/financial/" rel="tag">Financial</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/windows-general/" rel="tag">Windows - General</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right"src="http://www.downloadsquad.com/media/2006/03/microsoftbuilding.jpg" alt="" />According to an <ahref="http://www.nydailynews.com/business/story/400075p-338939c.html">article at  the New York Daily News</a>,Microsoft has settled a class-action lawsuit in the  state of New York that will allow anyone who purchased a Microsoftoperating  system between 1994 and 2004 in the state to be eligible for a $12 settlement,  up to a maximum of 5purchases. The crazy thing is that no proof of purchase is  required to take advantage of this settlement. As <ahref="http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/03/16/microsoft-ny-class-action-settlement/">Elliott  Back pointsout</a>, this means that everyone in New York is eligible to claim  $60 from Microsoft with no requirement of backingdocumentation proving they  deserve the money.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.microsoftnysettlement.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/28/class-action-suit-in-n-y/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/603394/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/28/class-action-suit-in-n-y/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>class action lawsuit</category><category>ClassActionLawsuit</category><category>microsoft class action</category><category>microsoft new york</category><category>MicrosoftClassAction</category><category>MicrosoftNewYork</category><category>New York lawsuit</category><category>NewYorkLawsuit</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-28T10:32:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>