<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Unofficial Microsoft Weblog</title>
<link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com</link>
<description>The Unofficial Microsoft Weblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>IE7 phishing filter thought this site to be a fraud</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/07/ie7-phishing-filter-thought-this-site-to-be-a-fraud/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/07/ie7-phishing-filter-thought-this-site-to-be-a-fraud/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/07/ie7-phishing-filter-thought-this-site-to-be-a-fraud/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/vista/" rel="tag">Vista</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/internet-explorer/" rel="tag">Internet Explorer</a></p><p>The last post regarding Marc Orchant`s OneNote article was the first that I have posted here running the Windows Vista and IE 7 betas. After making the post, I viewed it in IE to double-check that everything rendered correctly, and was greeted with a warning that The Unofficial Microsoft Weblog may indeed be a <a href="http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=49524&amp;CLCID=0x1009">phishing site</a>. </p>
<p>Now I commend Microsoft for doing something about the phishing problem that plagues the web - it`s certainly not going away, and anything the tools we use can do to help us not get taken in by these scams is welcome by me. Of course, it`s quite disconcerting to discover that one`s own site is considered to be a potential threat. </p>
<p>But, consider that we are a site that has `Microsoft`right in our sub-domain, even though we`re not part of Microsoft`s microsoft.com domain. And we collect information, if you call asking for a name, email address and URL to comment on posts as collecting information, which in fact it is. So it`s reasonable that software might consider us as a potential threat. </p>
<p>Fortunately,&nbsp; Microsoft foresaw that the tool might pick up many false positives, and offers a form right on the warning to allow site owners to alert the Phishing Filter team to the problem. There also appears to be a voting mechanism so that if enough regular site visitors tag the site as either legit or not, the site will be considered that way. Pretty cool, as long as that is not easily abused. </p>
<p>Kudos to Microsoft for attempting to further protect us. I can`t say that I`ll stick with IE7 for longer than it takes to get a feel for it - in my opinion Firefox is still leaps and bounds ahead of IE in terms of usability and extensibility. But so far IE7 is a welcome update to a sorely outdated browser. </p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=49524&amp;CLCID=0x1009>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/07/ie7-phishing-filter-thought-this-site-to-be-a-fraud/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/640423/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/07/ie7-phishing-filter-thought-this-site-to-be-a-fraud/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>phishing</category><category>phishing filter</category><category>PhishingFilter</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-07-07T02:54:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>IE 7 in Vista to be called IE 7+</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/29/ie-7-in-vista-to-be-called-ie-7/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/29/ie-7-in-vista-to-be-called-ie-7/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/29/ie-7-in-vista-to-be-called-ie-7/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/vista/" rel="tag">Vista</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/internet-explorer/" rel="tag">Internet Explorer</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/05/ie7plus.gif" />Microsoft has decided to differentiate between the version of Internet Explorer 7 that is available for Windows XP, and the version that will release with Windows Vista by <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/05/26/608255.aspx">calling the Vista version Internet Explorer 7+</a>. The reason for the difference in designation stems from the fact that there are features that will be included in IE on Vista that apparently were not easy to create for XP - presumably they rely on technologies that are built in to Vista. <br /><br />Of course I can't let this go by without mentioning that although this is a relatively minor example of it, this is yet another case of poor product naming. The 'plus' designation in software has had a long-standing perception of being a version of software that you pay extra for - and get extra features. In other words, a user that has IE 7 may well wonder what they can do to get IE 7+. When the answer turns out to be upgrade to Vista or buy a new PC, you can bet they won't be very impressed. <br /><br />In fact, is it really necessary to differentiate the products by name? It's perfectly reasonable that in any given product, some features that might rely on the operating system might be available in the new OS but not the old one. Isn't it?<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/05/26/608255.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/29/ie-7-in-vista-to-be-called-ie-7/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/622846/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/05/29/ie-7-in-vista-to-be-called-ie-7/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>IE 7</category><category>Ie7</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-05-29T15:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Microsoft warns against 3rd party fixes to IE vulnerability</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/03/microsoft-warns-against-3rd-party-fixes-to-ie-vulnerability/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/03/microsoft-warns-against-3rd-party-fixes-to-ie-vulnerability/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/03/microsoft-warns-against-3rd-party-fixes-to-ie-vulnerability/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/windows-general/" rel="tag">Windows - General</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/internet-explorer/" rel="tag">Internet Explorer</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.downloadsquad.com/media/2006/04/brokenwindows.jpg" align="right" vspace="4"border="1" alt="" />The <ahref="http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2006/03/31/152540-microsoft-warns-against-outside-fixes">Associated Press has anarticle</a> noting that Microsoft is warning people against installing 3rd party patches intended to fix the recentvulnerability in Microsoft's IE browser. This is the <ahref="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/29/unofficial-ie-patches/">same position I took last week</a>, howeverthe fact that Microsoft's ridiculous release schedule for fixes leaves an immeasurable number of users open to attackfor weeks before having the opportunity to access an official fix is just ludicrous. It is understandable that it maytake Microsoft longer than a security firm to pump out a fix, due to the amount of regression testing they must doagainst various software combinations, they must certainly have a fix ready to go before Patch Tuesday comes around. Ifthat is the case, just release the patch - as soon as it is ready. </p>
<p>And please re-think the Patch Tuesday strategy for security fixes.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2006/03/31/152540-microsoft-warns-against-outside-fixes>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/03/microsoft-warns-against-3rd-party-fixes-to-ie-vulnerability/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/605043/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/04/03/microsoft-warns-against-3rd-party-fixes-to-ie-vulnerability/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>IE security</category><category>IeSecurity</category><category>Patch Tuesday</category><category>PatchTuesday</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-03T01:24:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Unofficial IE patches available</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/29/unofficial-ie-patches/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/29/unofficial-ie-patches/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/29/unofficial-ie-patches/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/news-and-info/" rel="tag">News and Info</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/internet-explorer/" rel="tag">Internet Explorer</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/03/ie_logo.jpg"alt="" />Thanks to <ahref="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2006/03/29/unofficial-patches-fix-internet-explorer-vulnerability/">Jordan  over atDownloadSquad</a> for pointing out that although Microsoft is waiting  until Patch Tuesday to release fixes forcritical vulnerabilities in Internet  Explorer,&nbsp;two different temporary patches <ahref="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1943687,00.asp">have already been  released</a> by separate securitycompanies.
<p>While I would always caution users to avoid patching their system with  unofficial patches, it's nice toknow that it's possible to create a fix as  quickly as these two companies have been able to. If you have analternative  browser like Firefox or Opera, I would recommend using that until Microsoft is  able to officially patchthe vulnerability. If you don't, you many need to weigh  the risks of installing a 3rd party patch to protect yourbrowser against the <ahref="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/03/attacks_on_internet_explorer_f_1.html">current vulnerability</a>.<br /></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1943687,00.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/29/unofficial-ie-patches/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/603890/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/29/unofficial-ie-patches/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>ie vulnerability</category><category>IeVulnerability</category><dc:creator>Jason Clarke</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-29T14:41:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>New Internet Explorer every year or less</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/22/new-internet-explorer-every-year-or-less/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/22/new-internet-explorer-every-year-or-less/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/22/new-internet-explorer-every-year-or-less/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/visual-studio/" rel="tag">Visual Studio</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/net-framework/" rel="tag">.Net Framework</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/trends-and-buzz/" rel="tag">Trends and Buzz</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/internet-explorer/" rel="tag">Internet Explorer</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/03/ie7_small.jpg"alt="" />Talking at Microsoft's current <a href="http://www.mix06.com">Mix 06</a> <strike>conference</strike>conversation Bill Gates mentioned that IE could see a refresh every 9 to 12 months. This is a welcome change comparedto the almost non-existent update plan of over two years ago.&nbsp;Doesn't it remind you of the Netscape days?Also during Gates' <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/executives/billgates.mspx">keynote</a> Microsoftreleased their new Ajax framework for ASP.NET 2.0 codenamed <ahref="http://atlas.asp.net/default.aspx?tabid=47">Atlas</a>. Atlas should give developers a browser independentplatform to create rich websites with a minimum of fuss&nbsp;-- that's what the folks at Redmond are sayinganyway.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=183701121&amp;cid=RSSfeed_IWK_News>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/22/new-internet-explorer-every-year-or-less/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/601670/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/22/new-internet-explorer-every-year-or-less/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>.net</category><category>Ajax</category><category>Atlas</category><category>Mix06</category><dc:creator>Cameron McBride</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-22T05:07:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Ray Ozzie introduces Live Clipboard concept</title><link>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/08/ray-ozzie-introduces-live-clipboard-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/08/ray-ozzie-introduces-live-clipboard-concept/</guid><comments>http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/08/ray-ozzie-introduces-live-clipboard-concept/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/outlook/" rel="tag">Outlook</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/infopath/" rel="tag">InfoPath</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/frontpage/" rel="tag">FrontPage</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/windows-live/" rel="tag">Windows Live</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/office-live/" rel="tag">Office Live</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/windows-general/" rel="tag">Windows - General</a>, <a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/category/internet-explorer/" rel="tag">Internet Explorer</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/03/LiveClipboard.JPG" align="right" vspace="4"border="0" alt="" /><a href="http://spaces.msn.com/rayozzie/">Ray Ozzie</a>, Microsoft's acquired CTO from GrooveNetworks is <ahref="http://spaces.msn.com/rayozzie/blog/cns!FB3017FBB9B2E142!285.entry?_c11_blogpart_blogpart=blogview&amp;_c=blogpart#permalink">onfire these days</a>. Demonstrating a new concept for the web called Live Clipboard. The idea behind Live Clipboard is tomaintain the structure of copied data from web to web and from web to PC. This is something you really have to <ahref="http://spaces.msn.com/editorial/rayozzie/demo/liveclip/screencast/liveclipdemo.html">visualise to understand</a>,well I did anyway. Ray and friend's released this idea under the Creative Commons which will hopefully spur onadoption by the industry; so far <ahref="http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/03/07/ray-ozzies-clipboard-for-the-web/">Dave Winter is onboard</a>. What Ialso found interesting was that all the demonstrations I've seen so far were done using Firefox. Isn't itgreat when we work together?</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/08/ray-ozzie-introduces-live-clipboard-concept/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/forward/597552/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://microsoft.weblogsinc.com/2006/03/08/ray-ozzie-introduces-live-clipboard-concept/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Live Clipboard</category><category>LiveClipboard</category><dc:creator>Cameron McBride</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-03-08T02:58:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>